What can an RTX 5090 run?
The GeForce RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, 8 GB more than an RTX 4090 or RTX 3090.[1] The table below checks every language model in our calculator at three quantizations with an 8K-token context, using the same file sizes and fit rule as the rest of the site.
Best model for the RTX 5090 32GB: Mixtral 8x7B Instruct v0.1. It is the largest model in our calculator (46.7B parameters) that fits comfortably at 4-bit: Q4_K_M plus an 8K-token FP16 KV cache needs 27.5 GB, under 90% of 32 GB. The highest precision it fits comfortably at is 4-bit (Q4_K_M). In total, 22 of the 33 language models we track fit comfortably at 4-bit on this card.
| Model | 4-bit (Q4_K_M) | 8-bit (Q8_0) | 16-bit (FP16/BF16) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixtral 8x7B Instruct v0.1Mistral AI | 27.5 GB · Fits | 50.7 GB · Too big | 94.5 GB · Too big |
| Recursive FlintRecursive | 25.3 GB · Fits | 42.5 GB · Too big | 79.8 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba Qwen | 22.5 GB · Fits | 38.0 GB · Too big | 71.2 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3.8-35B-A3B (Empero Distill)Empero | 21.9 GB · Fits | 38.0 GB · Too big | 71.2 GB · Too big |
| Nanbeige4.3 33BNanbeige | 22.5 GB · Fits | 36.9 GB · Too big | 68.0 GB · Too big |
| Qwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Qwen | 22.0 GB · Fits | 37.0 GB · Too big | 67.7 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3 32BAlibaba Qwen | 21.9 GB · Fits | 37.0 GB · Too big | 67.7 GB · Too big |
| Gemma 4 31B*Google | 19.6 GB · Fits | 32.6 GB · Too big | 61.4 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba Qwen | 18.0 GB · Fits | 29.7 GB · Tight | 55.2 GB · Too big |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B*Google | 17.0 GB · Fits | 26.9 GB · Fits | 50.5 GB · Too big |
| LFM2.5-24B-A2BLiquid AI | 14.7 GB · Fits | 25.7 GB · Fits | 48.1 GB · Too big |
| gpt-oss-20bOpenAI | 11.9 GB · Fits | 12.3 GB · Fits | 14.0 GB · Fits |
| Qwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba Qwen | 10.6 GB · Fits | 17.3 GB · Fits | 31.2 GB · Tight |
| Qwen3 14BAlibaba Qwen | 10.3 GB · Fits | 17.0 GB · Fits | 30.9 GB · Tight |
| DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8BDeepSeek | 6.2 GB · Fits | 9.9 GB · Fits | 17.6 GB · Fits |
| Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta | 6.0 GB · Fits | 9.6 GB · Fits | 17.1 GB · Fits |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B*NVIDIA | 6.2 GB · Fits | 8.2 GB · Fits | 15.1 GB · Fits |
| Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba Qwen | 5.2 GB · Fits | 8.6 GB · Fits | 15.7 GB · Fits |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3Mistral AI | 5.4 GB · Fits | 8.8 GB · Fits | 15.6 GB · Fits |
| Spark-X2.6 4BXHToken | 3.8 GB · Fits | 4.7 GB · Fits | 8.5 GB · Fits |
| Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta | 3.0 GB · Fits | 4.4 GB · Fits | 7.4 GB · Fits |
| LFM3 1.7BLiquid AI | 1.2 GB · Fits | 1.9 GB · Fits | 3.6 GB · Fits |
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI | 1,508.9 GB · Too big | 1,561.4 GB · Too big | n/a |
| Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk)Mistral AI | 635.5 GB · Too big | 1,115.8 GB · Too big | 2,099.5 GB · Too big |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017DeepSeek | 500.7 GB · Too big | 508.4 GB · Too big | n/a |
| GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu AI) | 181.5 GB · Too big | 341.1 GB · Too big | 641.8 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3-235B-A22BAlibaba Qwen | 143.7 GB · Too big | 251.5 GB · Too big | 471.9 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibaba Qwen | 119.8 GB · Too big | 188.5 GB · Too big | 354.2 GB · Too big |
| Ornith-1.5-122BOrnith | 79.9 GB · Too big | 132.8 GB · Too big | 249.6 GB · Too big |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Qwen | 76.7 GB · Too big | 130.1 GB · Too big | 244.5 GB · Too big |
| gpt-oss-120bOpenAI | 63.1 GB · Too big | 63.7 GB · Too big | 65.7 GB · Too big |
| Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta | 45.2 GB · Too big | 77.7 GB · Too big | 143.8 GB · Too big |
| Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta | 45.2 GB · Too big | 77.7 GB · Too big | 143.8 GB · Too big |
Each cell is the Hugging Face GGUF file size plus FP16 KV cache for an 8K-token context (or the model's maximum, if shorter). Fits = under 90% of 32 GB; Tight = 90 to 100%; Too big = over 32 GB. * = KV cache not included (no config data). Same data as the VRAM calculator and what can I run with 32 GB. Data checked 2026-11-02.
Check one model at your own context length in the VRAM calculator with the RTX 5090 selected.
What the extra 8 GB buys over a 24 GB card
Using the same data as our 24 GB and 32 GB tier pages (weights + 8K FP16 KV cache, 90% line):
- Two models that don't fit 24 GB at all now fit: Mixtral 8x7B at Q4_K_M (27.5 GB) and Recursive Flint at Q4_K_M (25.3 GB).
- The 32B–35B class moves from tight to comfortable: Qwen3 32B (21.9 GB), Qwen2.5 32B (22.0 GB), Nanbeige4.3 33B (22.5 GB) and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (22.5 GB) are over 90% of a 24 GB card but under 71% of 32 GB, which leaves room for a longer context.
- Two small MoE models step up to 8-bit: Gemma 4 26B A4B (26.9 GB at Q8_0) and LFM2.5-24B-A2B (25.7 GB at Q8_0), versus 4-bit on 24 GB.
The 70B class still doesn't fit (see below).
RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090: specs
Specs from NVIDIA's product pages and the 50 Series compare table on them:[1][2][3]
| RTX 5090 | RTX 4090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 32 GB GDDR7, 512-bit | 24 GB GDDR6X, 384-bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,792 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s |
| CUDA cores | 21,760 | 16,384 |
| AI TOPS (NVIDIA figure) | 3,352 | 1,321 |
| Power (NVIDIA spec) | 575 W, 1,000 W PSU | 450 W, 850 W PSU |
| NVLink | No | No |
The bandwidth figures are not in the product pages' spec lists. They come from the "Memory Bandwidth" row of NVIDIA's RTX 50 Series compare table, which is loaded on the RTX 5090 page; the 4090's 1,008 GB/s matches NVIDIA's Ada whitepaper.[2][4]
Measured speed: RTX 5090 vs RTX 4090
Generating text is mostly limited by memory bandwidth, where the 5090 has about 78% more. Reading a prompt is limited by compute. Published llama.cpp results (CUDA, whole model on one GPU):
| Test (llama.cpp, CUDA) | RTX 5090 | RTX 4090 | 5090 lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 2 7B Q4_0, generation (tg128)[5] | 290.02 tok/s | 186.21 tok/s | +56% |
| Llama 2 7B Q4_0, prompt (pp512)[5] | 14,073.41 tok/s | 11,992.70 tok/s | +17% |
| Llama 2 7B Q4_0, generation, flash attention on[5] | 300.40 tok/s | 188.96 tok/s | +59% |
| gpt-oss-20b MXFP4, generation (tg128)[6] | 282.51 tok/s | 221.95 tok/s | +27% |
| gpt-oss-20b MXFP4, prompt (pp2048)[6] | 9,848.38 tok/s | 8,022.33 tok/s | +23% |
| gpt-oss-20b MXFP4, prompt (pp32768)[6] | 6,290.76 tok/s | 5,112.35 tok/s | +23% |
The Llama 2 rows are the scoreboard entries in llama.cpp discussion #15013 (different builds and testers for each card). The gpt-oss-20b rows come from the same guide, run by the same author with the same build (a094f38) and settings (-fa 1 -b 4096 -ub 2048). The lead column is our arithmetic.
We only list models with a published run on both cards. We don't give per-model speeds for the rest of the table above, because we haven't found sourced 5090 numbers for them. More results are on the measured speed page.
Power limit: one tester in the same discussion ran a 5090 at 400 W and at 600 W with the same build: generation was 236.73 vs 239.62 tok/s (about 1% apart), prompt reading 12,706.26 vs 14,751.98 tok/s (about 14% apart).[5] So for chat, capping the card's power costs little speed. That tester's numbers are lower than the scoreboard's, which shows how much systems and builds vary.
What doesn't fit on an RTX 5090
| Model | Needs (4-bit + 8K context) | On one 5090 | Cheapest single GPU that holds it (Runpod)[8] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | 45.2 GB | No | RTX A6000 48 GB, $0.33/hr Community (tight); A100 PCIe 80 GB, $1.19/hr Community |
| gpt-oss-120b | 63.1 GB | No (expert offload works) | A100 PCIe 80 GB, $1.19/hr Community |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 76.7 GB | No | RTX Pro 6000 96 GB, $1.69/hr Community |
Memory needs are from our calculator data (Llama 3.3 70B on a 5090). Runpod prices are listed per-GPU on-demand rates, checked November 2, 2026; Community Cloud runs on shared hosts. Our GPU cost per hour page also has Vast.ai prices for the same cards.
- gpt-oss-120b with expert offload: llama.cpp's gpt-oss guide gives about 30 tok/s at zero context on a 5090 with
--n-cpu-moe 21(21 layers of experts kept in system RAM). It warns that with--n-cpu-moe 20the model no longer fits in 32 GB, and that on Windows it can still load and then run very slowly, so check GPU memory in Task Manager.[6] See our MoE expert offload guide. - Two RTX 5090s (64 GB) hold Llama 3.3 70B at Q4_K_M with an 8K context at 71% of memory, which fits by our rule. We haven't found a published 2×5090 70B speed, so we don't quote one.
- Dense 70B with CPU offload loads on one 5090 with enough system RAM, but the layers in system RAM run much slower.
Watch out: the RTX 5090 Laptop GPU has 24 GB
NVIDIA's RTX 5090 Laptop GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 and 896 GB/s of bandwidth, not 32 GB.[7] For local LLMs it fits the same models as a 24 GB card. One laptop run in discussion #15013 (HP Omen Max 16, 140–160 W) measured 157.84 tok/s generation on the Llama 2 7B Q4_0 test, versus 290.02 for the desktop card.[5]
Rent an RTX 5090 instead
On Runpod, an RTX 5090 is listed at $0.69/hr on Community Cloud and $1.19/hr on Secure Cloud (checked November 2, 2026).[8]
- Rent on Vast.ai Affiliate partner
- Rent on Runpod Referral
Some links on this page are affiliate or referral links: we may get a commission or account credit if you sign up. See our disclosure.
More for 32 GB cards
- Everything that fits in 32 GB, including image generation and gaming
- Best GPUs for local LLMs: 32 GB, the RTX 5090 vs AMD's 32 GB Radeon AI PRO R9700
- RTX 4090 24GB fit table, the previous flagship
- Running LLMs on a Mac: unified memory instead of VRAM
Sources
All sources checked on .
- NVIDIA, GeForce RTX 5090 specs (32 GB GDDR7, 512-bit, 21,760 CUDA cores, 3,352 AI TOPS, 575 W total graphics power, 1,000 W required system power, NVLink: No, CUDA capability 12.0). Checked 2026-11-02. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/50-series/rtx-5090/
- NVIDIA, RTX 50 Series dynamic compare table loaded on the RTX 5090 page ("Memory Bandwidth": RTX 5090 1792 GB/sec, RTX 4090 1008 GB/sec; RTX 4090 1,321 AI TOPS). Checked 2026-11-02. https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/en-zz/Solutions/raw-html/dynamic-specs-table-50-series/v1.1.3.js
- NVIDIA, GeForce RTX 4090 specs (24 GB GDDR6X, 384-bit, 16,384 CUDA cores, 450 W, 850 W PSU, NVLink: No). Checked 2026-11-02. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/40-series/rtx-4090/
- NVIDIA, Ada GPU Architecture whitepaper, Appendix A (RTX 4090 memory bandwidth 1,008 GB/s). https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/Solutions/geforce/ada/nvidia-ada-gpu-architecture.pdf
- llama.cpp GitHub discussion #15013, "Performance of llama.cpp on Nvidia CUDA": scoreboard (RTX 5090 commit 8cf6b42, RTX 4090 commit 2241453; llama-bench pp512 / tg128), RodriMora's 400 W / 600 W runs (Aug 2, 2025, build 9c35706), henfiber's RTX 5090 Laptop run (Sep 16, 2026). Checked 2026-11-02. https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/15013
- llama.cpp GitHub discussion #15396, "guide : running gpt-oss with llama.cpp" (ggerganov): RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 gpt-oss-20b benchmarks (build a094f38) and the gpt-oss-120b
--n-cpu-moe 21tip. Checked 2026-11-02. https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/15396 - NVIDIA, GeForce RTX 50 Series laptops (RTX 5090 Laptop GPU: 24 GB GDDR7, 896 GB/s). Checked 2026-11-02. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/laptops/50-series/
- Runpod, GPU pricing (per-GPU on-demand rates; checked November 2, 2026), via our GPU price data. https://www.runpod.io/pricing
Too big for your card? Rent the VRAM by the hour, or upgrade.
Run it on a cloud GPU
No upgrade needed
Rent a 24–80 GB GPU for the hour you need it.
Buy this GPU
Own the VRAM
Compare current GPU prices first on our GPU price table and measured speeds.
We may earn from links marked Affiliate partner. Disclosure.